A War State All Over

Severance takes an unprecedented deep dive into the realities of Alabama’s wartime political environment to see how well these assumptions hold up to scrutiny. What he finds is a much greater degree of continuity in approach to support for the war than many have credited. While there were periods of frustration and doubt, Severance demonstrates that the Yellowhammer state’s commitment to the cause of Confederate independence never wavered until the bitter end. He looks at elections for the state legislature and Confederate congress in the pages of the book, providing some of the most detailed analysis of wartime election returns to be published. But the heart of Severance’s study revolves around the pivotal 1863 gubernatorial election pitting Shorter versus Watts and is the campaign covered in most depth. Anyone with an interest in Confederate politics or Alabama will find it interesting and informative.’
—The Historians Manifesto

‘Ben H. Severance’s A War State All Over: Alabama Politics and the Confederate Cause is a fine examination of a much-neglected subject. This well-researched, clearly written, and persuasively argued book offers a detailed account of key elections in Confederate Alabama. It should serve as a model for similar studies of wartime politics in other Southern states.’
—George C. Rable, author of Damn Yankees! Demonization and Defiance in the Confederate South and God’s Almost Chosen Peoples: A Religious History of the American Civil War

 

Ben H. Severance’s deep dig into Alabama’s Civil War politics rejects the prevailing assumption that state politicians and voters gave up on the Confederacy during the war’s second half. This is rigorous revisionism that deserves wide attention.’
—Kenneth Noe, author of Southwest Virginia’s Railroad: Modernization and the Sectional Crisis in the Civil War Era and editor of The Yellowhammer War: The Civil War and Reconstruction in Alabama

‘Alabama’ s midwar election of 1863 is revealing and understudied, and it matters for understanding the Confederacy. Ben Severance presents a well-researched and strongly-argued look. He contextualizes homefront dissent, emphasizing what the absence of the soldiers' votes meant politically. He must be right that most white Alabamians backed the war, despite the backlash against original secessionists. This work and McIlwain’s recent Civil War Alabama provide the interpretive bookends of discussion going forward.’
—Michael W. Fitzgerald, author of Splendid Failure: Postwar Reconstruction in the American South
 

This original contribution to the historiography of Alabama’s 1863 elections fills an important need by effectively demonstrating that Alabama’s elections for state and national representation, as well as how soldiers would have likely voted, were a repudiation of previous politicians, but not necessarily a repudiation of the war effort.’
—Joseph W. Danielson, author of War’s Desolating Scourge: The Union’s Occupation of North Alabama

'This relatively short volume provides a well-researched and documented look at the Alabama elections of 1863 and, in so doing, reminds readers that the Confederacy remained substantially committed to secession and a war for independence even after decisive turning points in the Civil War, such as the Emancipation Proclamation and the battles at Vicksburg and Gettysburg. Severance argues that while there were political variations within Alabama (driven by economic region and the dependence on maintaining slavery), the state remained steadfast in its commitment to the Confederate cause. This support was measured in legislative approval of the initiatives of Jefferson Davis's government, including conscription. The author’s conclusions rest on a detailed review of voting patterns for Confederate and state legislative and gubernatorial offices. He counters those who would argue that it was internal divisions that doomed he South in its effort to secede. A strength of the book is its attention to the historiography of Alabama and the Confederacy. Recommended.'
—CHOICE